|
|
PREVIOUS
HISTORY
The fortress could have been built
in the Punic (recent Phoenician)times, but up until now, no actual structures
have been found, although some ceramic fragments have. At this stage of
the arqueological investigation it can be affirmed that it was a roman
fortress pointing out the following remains which confirm it: remains
of a wall and door facing the west wind. Also have been found two cisterns
and a small necropolis of the Roman Decline in the interior of the building
and remains of rooms next to a medieval wall facing the East wind.
The fortress, during the
arab time has been caught up in events which geographers and especially
historians have narrated. The coming of Abderraman I, the revolt of Omar
ben Hafsun, the various events during the Reign of the Taifas in Granada,
the coming of the almoravides and almohades and very important the Nazarin
Reign in Granada produced important events in which the town of Almuñecar
and its fortress played an active part. The fortress in the nazarin time
,as well as being used as a recreational palace for the Sultans from Granada
was famous for its prison or dungeon where some dettroned Sultans were
imprisoned ministers fallen from grace, or military chiefs whose influence
inspired terror. Finally the fortress was handed over by the caid Ibn
al-Hay to the Catholic Kings in December 1489 after a defeat. After the
surrender it would be a christian fortress, receiving the name of the
holy patron of the town, undergoing a series of restorations and remodifications,
the first being in the time of Charles V when the castle was extended
with the building of a ditch and a draw-bridge, and the front entrance
with four circular turrents. In 1808 during the war of Independence, it
was in the hands of the french and was bombed by the English fleet, remaining
in a ruinous state and practically without any defensive worth, so that
in 1834 it was made into the cementary of the town and used as such until
very recently.
|
|
|
The
second occupied the position of the Barbican defensive having been
documented from the visible base to the bottom of the ditch before
being covered in stone, a stone wall of the thickeness of the bridge
with a depth of three metres, sixty centimetres.
On the south wall of this opening in the bridge is found a door, that
behind a small landing a flight of steps goes down in the direction
of the rock on which is built the castle, where two passages fork
off which show us the place where the guards of the fortress came
out in the direction of the barbican to surprise the enemies from
behind who tried to force an entry. Going through the main door we
find ourselves in front of what was possibly the
Tower of Homage, where the caid used to live and presumably is of
the Nazarin time, showing later remodifications. On both sides of
the tower are visible remains of the defensive walls which converge
on it.
We continue the visit through a kind of corridor between the old wall
which shows remains of a door with two pavings of different times
and the wall from the time of Charles V , ending in a circular tower
leaning against another quadrangular tower made of mud which should
belong to the early Arabs.
From this tower, a mud wall faces the North-South direction, facing
the East wind, which owing to its bad state of conservation was covered
on the outside with stone as was also the main part. Towards the South
front we find a ramp which leads to an area where the set of cannons
were located. Actually, without excavating one can observe arab remains
in mud technique of real interest and which are found blocked by a
wall of the time of Charles V which limits the place for the set of
cannons.
The interior of the castle does not actually have a flat surface such
as one would think a place for weapons should have. |
|
|